Motorcycle Minds

Motorcycle Minds - Global Connection - Form An Opinion

  • Home
  • Latest Articles
    • Latest Articles
    • Comments
    • Subscribe to News & Articles
  • The Bike
  • The Rider
  • The Road
  • The World
  • Virtual Research Library
    • Virtual Research Library
    • Videos
  • Links
You are here: Home / Features / Not Retrospective Anti Tampering

Not Retrospective Anti Tampering

25th April 2022 by Motorcycleminds Leave a Comment

United Kingdom – Government Confirms That Anti Tampering Proposals Will Not Be Retrospective

The National Motorcyclists Council (NMC) reports that an awaited debate on a petition calling on “new” government proposals not to include anti-tampering measures in parts or components of a vehicle intended or adapted to be used on a road.

In full their report to the debate is as follows.

Minister says that measures will be limited to environmental aspects and autonomous driver software systems on new and future vehicles, with heritage and sports vehicles, plus customisation protected.

Parliament has today debated a petition, which opposes potential new regulations against so called vehicle ‘anti tampering. The petition; “Do not implement proposed new offences for vehicle “tampering” was tabled by Gareth James and attracted more than 115,000 signatures making it eligible for a parliamentary debate.

The original proposals were revealed in a consultation on ‘The Future of Transport Regulatory Review – Modernising Vehicle Standards’ during 2021.

This consultation proved to be highly controversial, generating wide attention in the motorcycle world and the media, given how the wording in the consultation was interpreted by the wider public. It was worded in such a way that suggests that all types of modifications of motorcycles will be outlawed. It also went further by proposing to outlaw the marketing, promotion and sale of ‘tampering services or products’. The NMC and other motorcycling organisations responded to the consultation, rejecting the proposals and called on the government to clarify, in detail, what it means by ‘tampering’.

In today’s debate, which was opened by Nick Fletcher from Parliament’s petitions committee, several members spoke against the proposals as they stand, citing concerns about the damage wide ranging anti tampering regulations could do to the classic vehicle sector, motor/motorcycle sports and the aftermarket parts accessories and customisation sector. Steve Baker MP, a member of the Parliamentary Motorcycle Group, spoke with passion about how sensible modifications have improved his riding experience. Other members spoke about the social nuisance caused by modified car exhausts and public highway racing – all matters which are covered by current regulations.

Responding for the Government, transport minister Trudy Harrison MP said that 7,891 people responded to the consultation and confirmed that the government would announce its further plans during the summer. It is still considering its approach to any new laws.

She spoke warmly about the long heritage of vehicle modification and the industries which support this and revealed she modified her own cars when she was younger. She said that the Government’s plans should protect a healthy after market sector and protect motor sports and heritage vehicles. Ms Harrison. firmly stated that any new regulations will not be retrospective, with new measures targeting ‘safety and health’ particularly the tampering of advanced and autonomous driving systems and modifications that increase emissions from new and future generations of vehicles.

Craig Carey-Clinch, NMC Executive Director said: “Nick Fletcher MP should be thanked for steering this debate where he concluded by saying he felt that the Government has listened to concerns. The Minister’s response indicates that this could be the case. Ruling out historic vehicles is a welcome step, but as always, the devil will be in the detail concerning this and what the fine detail will be in relation to safety and emissions systems. But for now it is clear that motorcyclists and other motoring groups have made a significant impact, demonstrating the value of political engagement by both individuals and representative organisations. We will await the government’s more details plans with interest to see if the Minister’s warm words today translate into a positive result.”

Motorcycle Minds – We wait for responses from rider groups most affected by the issue and how far some will go down the rabbit hole of disappointment!

Original Source – National Motorcyclists Council (NMC) 

The National Motorcyclists Council members are: The Auto Cycle Union, the British Motorcyclists Federation, IAM RoadSmart, the National Motorcycle Dealers Association, Plantec Assist, the Trail Riders Fellowship and the Vintage Motor Cycle Club

Share this...
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

Filed Under: Features, The Bike Tagged With: Organisations, Our Lifestyle

« Motorcycle Aftermarket Survey – 2022
International Report – Light Of Day »

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Motorcycle Minds

Motorcycle Minds

Latest Articles

  • Dropping The Price?
  • Motorcycle Theft and Jolly Good Company
  • India – Recognized As A Solution!
  • A Cosmic Plot
  • Initial Rider Training for Motorcyclists
  • Flogging a Dead Horse
  • We Are Still The Boat Rockers and Freedom Fighters!
  • ICE Battle Ground and Net Zero

On Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons
Motorcycle Minds
1 month ago

DROPPING THE PRICE?

In February 2024 we published an article about motorcycle theft, this was then republished in May this year entitled "Motorcycle Theft and Jolly Good Company"

In the last few months there has been a flurry of campaigns and articles by organisations involved in motorcycle lobbying.
Our article covered the issues like legislation and why part of the problem was the lack of adequate security in the manufacture of motorcycles/scooters/mopeds.

It also explained the reasons for theft, amongst which a major issue being theft for spare parts. We all know that motorcycle parts are very expensive, especially OEM parts (original manufacturer parts). Yet none of the lobbying organisations are prepared to challenge the industry to lower their prices as an attempt or even a gesture to discourage thieves from making money out of spare parts. When the lobbying organisations decide to work hand in hand with industry, it compromises their autonomy.

Then there are the "Clubs" like the Motorcycle Crime Reduction Group which are no more than talk shops where the boys (police, manufacturers, insurance companies, security companies, lobby groups etc) all sit round a table, talk a lot, have a cup of tea and biscuits then do nothing until the next meeting.

Ultimately insurers and motorcycle manufacturers don't care. If anything it gives the insurers the opportunity to increase your premiums and scare you into paying higher rates with the premise that your bike is at risk. investigativeresearch.org/documents/The%20Fear%20Industry.pdf

Also to consider that having your bike stolen can give the manufacturers the opportunity to sell more of them. The best you can get from the police is to be told that bike has been shipped to Eastern Europe rather than ending up in an auction house or in a scrap yard to be sold on in pieces.

So how about it MCIA/ACEM - how about you get the manufacturers to drop the prices of OEM spare parts? You never know, it might just make a difference.

motorcycleminds.org/2026/09/20/dropping-the-price/

Motorcycle Theft and Jolly Good Company motorcycleminds.org/2024/02/06/motorcycle-theft-and-jolly-good-company/
...

Shared link preview image

Dropping The Price?

motorcycleminds.org

In the last few months there has been a flurry of campaigns and articles by organisations involved in motorcycle lobbying.
View on Facebook (opens in a new tab)
· Share
Share on Facebook (opens in a new tab) Share on Twitter (opens in a new tab) Share on LinkedIn (opens in a new tab) Share by Email (opens in a new tab)
View Comments Like reaction Reactions: 0 Shares: 1 Comments: 0

0 CommentsComment on Facebook

  • E-mail
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter

Twitter

MC_Minds avatar; Motorcycle Minds @MC_Minds ·
20 Sep 2101808106846007752

Dropping The Price? Previously we published an article about motorcycle theft “Motorcycle Theft and Jolly Good Company“

In the last few months there has been a flurry of campaigns and articles by organisations involved in motorcycle lobbying.

Image for twitter card

Dropping The Price?

In the last few months there has been a flurry of campaigns and articles by organisations involved in motorcycle lobbying.

motorcycleminds.org

Reply on Twitter 2101808106846007752 Retweet on Twitter 2101808106846007752 0 Like on Twitter 2101808106846007752 0 Twitter 2101808106846007752

Tags

AutomationI BarriersI BikerI ClothingI Crash BarriersI DangerousI DisabilityI DURO RIDERI EnvironmentalI EspanaI EuropeI ExpertsI FranceI GazaI HelmetI Hurt ReportI IndustryI LillehammerI LondonI MotorcyclistsI NoiseI OrganisationsI Our LifestyleI ParkingI ProtectiveI RacingI ResearchI RiderI RoadI SafetyI ScooterI SpainI SpeedI StrategiesI ThailandI The BikeI TheftI TrainingI United StatesI VietnamI Wire RopeI

Translate:

Motorcycle Minds is about the motorcycle – scooter the Powered Two Wheeler (PTW), Trikes and Sidecars as the best means of personal transport throughout the world.

Subscribe to Motorcycle Minds

Subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email. Contribute to Motorcycle Minds We would also love to hear from you if you have any interesting articles to send us, to give you an … Subscribe Here

Motorcycle Minds

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Terms Conditions Private Policy
  • Contribute
  • Comments

Copyright © 2026 · Motorcycle Minds · MAGAZINE PRO on GENESIS FRAMEWORK · Magazine Pro Child Theme Modified by ABOUTYE DESIGN

By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our use of cookies.